{"id":47026,"date":"2025-12-20T11:47:49","date_gmt":"2025-12-20T15:47:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/?p=47026"},"modified":"2026-01-29T12:20:12","modified_gmt":"2026-01-29T16:20:12","slug":"itam-vs-itsm-in-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/itam-vs-itsm-in-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"ITAM vs ITSM in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Effective IT Asset Management (ITAM) and IT Service Management (ITSM) used to be seen as separate disciplines \u2013 one \u201ccounting hardware and licenses\u201d, the other \u201crunning the service desk\u201d. In 2025, that separation is a liability. To manage cyber risk, optimise costs, and support digital transformation, organisations increasingly need ITAM and ITSM to work as a single, integrated operating model, not competing silos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Executive Summary<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>ITAM focuses on the lifecycle of technology assets \u2013 from planning and acquisition through deployment, support, and retirement \u2013 with strong emphasis on cost, compliance, and risk. ITSM focuses on the design, delivery, and continuous improvement of IT services that use those assets to deliver business value. Treated separately, they create data gaps, security blind spots, and inefficient processes. Integrated, they provide a single source of truth for \u201cwhat we own\u201d and \u201chow it\u2019s used\u201d, enabling better security, governance, and financial control. This article explores the core differences, overlaps, and practical steps to build a unified ITAM\u2013ITSM framework, illustrated with examples from modern platforms such as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.alloysoftware.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Alloy Software<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why ITAM and ITSM Are Converging<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Several macro trends are pushing ITAM and ITSM together:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Explosive growth of digital assets \u2013 laptops, mobiles, IoT, SaaS, cloud infrastructure and shadow tools.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cybersecurity and compliance pressure \u2013 regulators and auditors expect reliable visibility of systems, data flows, and ownership.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Hybrid and remote work \u2013 users consume services from anywhere, often on devices that IT does not fully control.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cost optimisation and FinOps \u2013 organisations want to know whether services are delivering value relative to their asset and subscription spend.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In this context, asking \u201cITAM vs ITSM \u2013 which is more important?\u201d is the wrong question. The real question is: <em>How do we align them so that operations, finance, and security all see the same reality?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Is IT Asset Management (ITAM)?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Definition<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.alloysoftware.com\/it-asset-management-software\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Asset Management<\/a> is the set of processes, data, and governance that ensure IT assets are identified, tracked, optimised, and retired in a controlled way throughout their lifecycle. Standards such as ISO\/IEC 19770-1:2017 define ITAM as a management system that applies to hardware, software, subscriptions, services and other IT-related assets.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ITAM Goals<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Typical strategic goals include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Visibility &amp; control \u2013 knowing <em>what<\/em> assets exist, <em>where<\/em> they are, <em>who<\/em> uses them, and <em>how<\/em> they are configured.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cost optimisation \u2013 right-sizing hardware and software, eliminating unused licenses, and reducing redundant tools.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Compliance &amp; audit readiness \u2013 managing license terms, contracts, and renewals to reduce legal and financial exposure.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Risk management \u2013 decommissioning unsupported assets, controlling unauthorised software, and reducing the attack surface.<br><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Scope of ITAM<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Modern ITAM extends far beyond a simple hardware inventory:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Hardware assets \u2013 endpoints, servers, network gear, printers, specialised devices.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Software assets \u2013 installed applications, cloud services, SaaS, APIs, line-of-business tools.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cloud &amp; virtual assets \u2013 VMs, containers, IaaS resources, storage, PaaS services.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subscriptions and services \u2013 support contracts, warranties, security tools, monitoring platforms.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ITAM in the Cybersecurity Context<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>From a cyber perspective, ITAM underpins:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Attack surface management \u2013 you cannot secure what you cannot see.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Incident response \u2013 quickly answering \u201cWhat is this device? Who owns it? What data does it touch?\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vulnerability management \u2013 knowing which assets run vulnerable versions and whether they are business-critical.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For security teams, mature ITAM is not a \u201cnice to have\u201d, it is a foundational control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Is IT Service Management (ITSM)?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Definition<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.alloysoftware.com\/it-service-management-software\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Service Management<\/a> is how organisations design, plan, deliver, support, and improve the IT services consumed by users and customers. Frameworks such as ITIL 4 describe ITSM as a set of management practices that coordinate people, processes, and technology to create value through services.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ITSM Goals<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Key goals usually include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Service quality and reliability \u2013 minimising downtime and service degradation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Customer and user satisfaction \u2013 making it easy to request help and track progress.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Operational efficiency \u2013 standardising workflows, automating repetitive tasks, and reducing firefighting.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Business alignment \u2013 ensuring IT services genuinely support strategic objectives, not just \u201ckeep the lights on\u201d.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Scope of ITSM<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>An ITSM practice typically covers:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Incident and request management \u2013 handling break\/fix and standard requests.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Problem management \u2013 addressing root causes, not just symptoms.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Change enablement \u2013 assessing and controlling changes to minimise risk.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Service catalogue &amp; SLA management \u2013 defining what IT offers, at what quality levels and cost.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Configuration &amp; knowledge management \u2013 maintaining CMDB data and reusable knowledge articles.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ITSM and Cybersecurity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>ITSM is also critical for cyber resilience:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Change management reduces configuration drift and uncontrolled exposure.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Incident management often integrates with security operations (SecOps and SOC workflows).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Service continuity management connects directly with disaster recovery and business continuity planning.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ITAM vs ITSM: Key Differences<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Although they are closely related, ITAM and ITSM have different primary lenses:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>Dimension<\/td><td>ITAM<\/td><td>ITSM<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Primary focus<\/td><td>Assets (what we own &amp; use)<\/td><td>Services (what we deliver &amp; support)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Typical owner<\/td><td>Finance, operations, or ITAM team<\/td><td>Service desk, operations, or ITSM team<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Core data objects<\/td><td>Assets, contracts, licenses, configurations<\/td><td>Incidents, requests, changes, services, SLAs<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Time horizon<\/td><td>Full lifecycle (plan \u2192 retire)<\/td><td>Operational phase (deliver \u2192 support \u2192 improve)&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Primary KPIs<\/td><td>Asset utilisation, compliance, spend<\/td><td>SLA achievement, MTTR, customer satisfaction<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Security impact<\/td><td>Visibility, risk and compliance baseline<\/td><td>Detection, response, and controlled change<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>In simple terms: ITAM knows <em>what<\/em> you have; ITSM governs <em>how<\/em> you use it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"998\" height=\"548\" src=\"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-9.png\" alt=\"ITAM vs ITSM: Key Differences\" class=\"wp-image-47028\" style=\"width:688px;height:auto\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-9.png 998w, https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-9-300x165.png 300w, https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-9-768x422.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 998px) 100vw, 998px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Where ITAM and ITSM Overlap<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite their different perspectives, there are critical overlap areas:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Configuration Management (CMDB) \u2013 a shared backbone that maps assets to configuration items (CIs) and services.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Change and release \u2013 ITAM needs to know when assets are deployed, repurposed, or retired; ITSM controls the change process.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Incident and problem management \u2013 resolving a ticket is faster when the agent sees the asset\u2019s history, ownership, and configuration.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Software compliance in workflows \u2013 approvals for new software often rely on ITAM data about license availability and risk.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Onboarding and offboarding \u2013 combining service requests with automated asset assignment and reclamation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"426\" src=\"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-10-1024x426.png\" alt=\"CMBD\" class=\"wp-image-47029\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-10-1024x426.png 1024w, https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-10-300x125.png 300w, https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-10-768x319.png 768w, https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-10-1536x638.png 1536w, https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/image-10.png 1600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>When ITAM and ITSM share data and processes, the organisation gets a consistent view of technology risk, cost, and performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why Integrated ITAM + ITSM Delivers the Highest Business Value<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">1. Operational Efficiency<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Integrated ITAM\u2013ITSM reduces duplication:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Service desk agents no longer chase spreadsheets to understand which device belongs to whom.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Asset updates can be triggered automatically by service requests and change records.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Decommissioning a service can automatically trigger asset retirement workflows and license reclamation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2. Security &amp; Compliance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Security teams benefit from a shared asset\u2013service view:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Faster incident triage \u2013 from an alert on an endpoint, analysts can rapidly see services, owners, and business criticality.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Better vulnerability management \u2013 asset and service context helps prioritise patching where it matters most.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Regulatory readiness \u2013 auditors expect evidence that the organisation controls both its assets and the services built on them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">3. Cost Optimisation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Integrated data supports:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Identification of underused licenses and hardware tied to low-value or redundant services.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Smarter renewal decisions based on real consumption and service importance.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Joint planning between IT, security, and finance around refresh cycles and cloud consumption.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">4. Better Decision-Making<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Executives gain a more complete picture:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Which services rely on legacy or unsupported assets?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where are high-risk assets supporting critical services without appropriate controls?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Which service portfolios deliver the most value relative to their asset and licensing cost?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key Challenges When ITAM and ITSM Operate Separately<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Many organisations still run ITAM and ITSM as independent initiatives. Typical pain points include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Data silos \u2013 service desk tools and asset databases contain overlapping but inconsistent information.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Inaccurate CMDB \u2013 CIs are created once and never updated, leading to low trust in configuration data.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Shadow IT and blind spots \u2013 security and operations teams discover devices or SaaS subscriptions only during incidents.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Manual, error-prone processes \u2013 onboarding, offboarding, and refreshes rely on emails and spreadsheets.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Compliance gaps \u2013 licenses are over-deployed or under-used because ITAM has no visibility into live service usage.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>These challenges are not purely technical; they reflect missing governance and a lack of shared ownership between ITAM, ITSM, security, and finance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Best Practices for Building a Unified ITAM\u2013ITSM Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">1. Establish a Single Source of Truth<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Create a shared data model where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>CMDB and asset repository are tightly aligned, ideally within one platform or tightly integrated tools.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Assets are linked to services, owners, locations, and business functions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2. Automate Discovery<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Use automated discovery and inventory to continuously populate asset and configuration data:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Network and endpoint discovery<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cloud and SaaS discovery<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Integration with identity providers (for ownership)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This keeps both ITAM and ITSM data fresh and trustworthy.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">3. Map Assets to Services and Risk<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>For every key service, define:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The supporting assets and configurations<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Data sensitivity and regulatory scope<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Business impact of downtime<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This mapping becomes invaluable for security assessments, business continuity, and change impact analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">4. Align Processes with Established Standards<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Use established frameworks as guardrails rather than rigid rules:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>ITIL 4 for service management practices (incident, change, problem, request, service catalogue).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ISO\/IEC 19770-1 for structuring ITAM as a management system with clear policies, roles, and continual improvement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">5. Create Shared Governance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Define a joint steering group or governance forum that includes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>IT operations \/ service management<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ITAM \/ finance and procurement<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cybersecurity \/ risk<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Business stakeholders<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Their mandate: prioritise integrated initiatives, approve policies, and resolve conflicts between cost, risk, and service quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">6. Integrate Incident, Change, and Asset Lifecycle<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Design workflows so that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>New hardware or software requests automatically create or update asset records.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Changes that affect configurations update both CMDB and asset repositories.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Decommissioning a service triggers retirement or repurposing of related assets and licenses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">7. Make Reporting Cross-Functional<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Move away from siloed reports (e.g. \u201cITAM report\u201d, \u201cITSM report\u201d) and instead provide:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Joint risk and compliance dashboards \u2013 linking assets, services, and controls.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cost vs value views \u2013 combining license\/asset spend with service SLAs and usage.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Executive summaries that speak to business outcomes, not just technical metrics.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How Modern Platforms Support ITAM\u2013ITSM Convergence<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The growing complexity of IT environments makes manual integration unsustainable. Modern platforms increasingly combine ITAM, ITSM, and sometimes discovery and configuration management in a single solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Solutions in this space, including Alloy Software and <a href=\"https:\/\/invgate.com\/service-management\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">InvGate Service Management<\/a> exemplify this convergence by:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Providing a unified CMDB and asset repository with automated discovery.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Linking incidents, requests, changes, and problems directly to specific assets and services.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Supporting full lifecycle management \u2013 from procurement and deployment to retirement and disposal.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Offering role-based dashboards for operations, security, and finance, all based on the same underlying data.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For organisations just starting this journey, a platform that natively supports both ITAM and ITSM can significantly reduce integration overheads and accelerate maturity. For those with existing tools, Alloy-style architectures show the design principles to aim for: shared data, consistent workflows, and strong analytics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Future Trends: Where ITAM and ITSM Are Heading<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Looking ahead, several trends are reshaping how ITAM and ITSM will operate:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>AI-driven discovery and correlation \u2013 machine learning to detect unknown assets, group them into services, and highlight anomalies.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Predictive analytics \u2013 forecasting asset failures, capacity issues, and licence shortfalls before they impact services.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Deeper integration with cybersecurity (CAASM) \u2013 cyber-asset attack surface management tools increasingly rely on ITAM and ITSM data to identify exposures.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>FinOps + ITAM + ITSM triangulation \u2013 cloud cost management disciplines depend on accurate asset data and service usage metrics.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Greater focus on user experience \u2013 end-users expect consumer-grade portals where service requests, assets, and approvals are all visible in one place.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>These trends reinforce the same message: asset and service data need to live together and be continuously enriched, not managed as separate spreadsheets or disconnected modules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u201cITAM vs ITSM\u201d Is the Wrong Question<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In an earlier era, organisations could treat ITAM as a back-office inventory function and ITSM as a front-line support discipline. Today, that separation undermines security, governance, and financial control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>ITAM provides hard facts about what exists \u2013 assets, contracts, licenses, and their lifecycle states.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ITSM provides structured processes for how technology is used \u2013 services, tickets, changes, and SLAs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The real value emerges when these views converge into a single, trusted, and continuously updated model of the IT environment. Platforms such as Alloy Software, coupled with frameworks like ITIL 4 and ISO\/IEC 19770-1, give organisations the tools and guidance to make that convergence real \u2013 not just conceptually attractive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For digital-first enterprises and security-conscious sectors alike, the strategic move is clear: stop asking whether ITAM or ITSM \u201cmatters more\u201d, and start designing an operating model in which assets, services, risk, and value are managed together.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Effective IT Asset Management (ITAM) and IT Service Management (ITSM) used to be seen as separate disciplines \u2013 one \u201ccounting hardware and licenses\u201d, the other \u201crunning the service desk\u201d. In 2025, that separation is a liability. To manage cyber risk, optimise costs, and support digital transformation, organisations increasingly need ITAM and ITSM to work as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47026"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47026\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47146,"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47026\/revisions\/47146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/appsgeyser.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}